Triple
T31161439
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Holly Cole |
E794348
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPerformed |
P191979
|
FINISHED |
| Object | jazz standards |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: jazz standards | Statement: [Holly Cole, hasPerformed, jazz standards]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPerformed Context triple: [Holly Cole, hasPerformed, jazz standards]
-
A.
performedFirst
Indicates that one entity carried out an action or event before another entity did.
-
B.
hasPresented
Indicates that one entity has formally given, delivered, or shown something (such as information, a work, or an award) to another entity.
-
C.
hasMet
Indicates that one entity has encountered or come into contact with another entity at least once.
-
D.
hasMade
Indicates that an entity has created, produced, or brought about another entity or outcome.
-
E.
hasHad
Indicates that an entity previously experienced, possessed, or was involved in something at some point in the past.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d504908190b01278dcb7fc3fa7 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcf1b3d9a08190850b388308656266 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf0226d8c8190b23dceafb1794995 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcf1b241888190a243f07051c71383 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:07 p.m.