Triple
T31152954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ernest C. Manning |
E794128
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta |
C27926
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta Context triple: [Ernest C. Manning, instanceOf, member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta]
-
A.
member of legislative assembly
chosen
A member of legislative assembly is an elected representative who serves in a regional or state legislature, participating in lawmaking, governance oversight, and constituency representation.
-
B.
former Member of Parliament of Canada
A former Member of Parliament of Canada is an individual who previously held an elected seat in the House of Commons but no longer serves in that capacity.
-
C.
member of the Liberal Party of Canada
A member of the Liberal Party of Canada is an individual who formally affiliates with and supports the policies, values, and political activities of the Liberal Party at the federal level in Canada.
-
D.
Member of the House of Commons of Canada
A Member of the House of Commons of Canada is an elected representative who serves in the federal lower chamber of Parliament, proposing, debating, and voting on legislation and public policy on behalf of a specific electoral district (riding).
-
E.
Yukon politician
A Yukon politician is an elected or appointed public official who represents the interests of residents in Canada’s Yukon Territory at territorial or federal levels of government.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d41bb48190a5621cd1485e3a30 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:06 p.m.