Triple

T31144205
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sexta Ley Constitucional E793874 entity
Predicate tipo de norma P2826 FINISHED
Object ley fundamental LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ley fundamental | Statement: [Sexta Ley Constitucional, tipo de norma, ley fundamental]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tipo de norma
Context triple: [Sexta Ley Constitucional, tipo de norma, ley fundamental]
  • A. normativeFor
    Indicates that something establishes, prescribes, or encodes the norms, standards, or rules that should govern another thing’s behavior or state.
  • B. normType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or classification of a norm that governs or constrains an entity or situation.
  • C. natureOfRule
    Indicates the fundamental type or character of a rule, specifying what kind of rule it is or how it functions within a system.
  • D. legalStandardType
    Indicates the specific type or category of legal standard that governs or applies to a given legal rule, decision, or evaluation.
  • E. hasNorm
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, governed by, or characterized through a particular norm, rule, or standard.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224d2b3a48190aa9dd26fbf6eab1a completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69c234d648190a243fb2b107136a9 completed May 3, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69665cd9c819088c388fc82fec42e completed May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:06 p.m.