Triple

T31144196
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sexta Ley Constitucional E793874 entity
Predicate contexto jurídico P2132 FINISHED
Object Leyes Constitucionales centralistas de México LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leyes Constitucionales centralistas de México | Statement: [Sexta Ley Constitucional, contexto jurídico, Leyes Constitucionales centralistas de México]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contexto jurídico
Context triple: [Sexta Ley Constitucional, contexto jurídico, Leyes Constitucionales centralistas de México]
  • A. legalContext chosen
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
  • B. juridicalCategory
    Indicates the legal classification or status under which an entity or relationship is formally recognized in a juridical system.
  • C. legalDoctrine
    Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
  • D. legalBackground
    Indicates that an entity has education, training, or experience related to law or the legal profession.
  • E. jurisprudenciaObligatoriaPara
    Indicates that a given judicial decision or precedent is legally binding and must be followed in decisions concerning the referenced entity or case.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224d2b3a48190aa9dd26fbf6eab1a completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7465687bc8190a9da44d62b634ed7 completed May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f743f4ceb08190a21fe7f4a99b166b completed May 3, 2026, 12:47 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:06 p.m.