Triple
T31140022
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Revelation by Artemis |
E793754
|
entity |
| Predicate | revealsInnocenceOf |
P141732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hippolytus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hippolytus | Statement: [Revelation by Artemis, revealsInnocenceOf, Hippolytus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: revealsInnocenceOf Context triple: [Revelation by Artemis, revealsInnocenceOf, Hippolytus]
-
A.
actuallyInnocentOf
Indicates that an entity is truly not responsible for or did not commit the action, offense, or wrongdoing in question, regardless of prior accusations or judgments.
-
B.
provesInnocenceBy
chosen
Indicates that one party establishes or demonstrates another party’s lack of guilt through evidence, argument, or legal process.
-
C.
claimedInnocenceOf
Indicates that one entity asserts or maintains that another entity is not guilty of a particular accusation or wrongdoing.
-
D.
afterRealizingInnocenceOf
Indicates that one entity takes or experiences some action or change in attitude after coming to understand that another entity is innocent.
-
E.
worksToProveInnocenceOf
Indicates that one entity actively engages in efforts or actions aimed at demonstrating or establishing the innocence of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d2b3a48190aa9dd26fbf6eab1a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69dfdda708190be290c7bec205445 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69d1a37e081908d1d86b90ff502bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:05 p.m.