Triple
T31123399
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas–New York sports rivalry |
E793281
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intercity rivalry |
C778
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: intercity rivalry Context triple: [Texas–New York sports rivalry, instanceOf, intercity rivalry]
-
A.
regional rivalry
Regional rivalry is a competitive and often tense relationship between neighboring areas or countries, driven by historical, cultural, economic, or political differences as they vie for influence, resources, or prestige.
-
B.
sports rivalry
chosen
A sports rivalry is a competitive relationship between teams, athletes, or fan bases characterized by repeated contests, heightened emotions, and historical or cultural significance that intensifies their matchups.
-
C.
Argentine football derby
An Argentine football derby is a fiercely contested soccer match between rival clubs from Argentina, deeply rooted in local identity, history, and passionate fan culture.
-
D.
rugby union rivalry
A rugby union rivalry is a recurring, often historically rooted competitive relationship between two rugby union teams or nations, characterized by intense matches, strong fan engagement, and cultural or regional significance beyond ordinary fixtures.
-
E.
intra-state rivalry
Intra-state rivalry is a sustained, competitive relationship between distinct political, social, or armed actors operating within the same state who contest authority, resources, or legitimacy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d0a7688190af3fe3e6e26d01ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:05 p.m.