Triple
T31120859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yaya dialect |
E793218
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of Ngamo language |
C59282
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of Ngamo language Context triple: [Yaya dialect, instanceOf, variety of Ngamo language]
-
A.
Manggarai language variety
A Manggarai language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Manggarai language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Manggarai-speaking community.
-
B.
variety of Wapishana language
A variety of the Wapishana language is a distinct regional or social form of Wapishana, characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
C.
Kunama language variety
A Kunama language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Kunama language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Kunama linguistic continuum.
-
D.
Yao language variety
A Yao language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Yao language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Yao linguistic continuum.
-
E.
variety of Kunama language
A variety of Kunama language is a distinct regional or social form of the Kunama language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features within the broader Kunama-speaking community.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d0a7688190af3fe3e6e26d01ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:04 p.m.