Triple
T31120117
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minnesota congressional delegation |
E793198
|
entity |
| Predicate | canVoteOnFederalLaws |
P1084
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Minnesota congressional delegation, canVoteOnFederalLaws, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canVoteOnFederalLaws Context triple: [Minnesota congressional delegation, canVoteOnFederalLaws, yes]
-
A.
hasElectoralRight
Indicates that an entity possesses the legal right to participate in elections, typically by voting or standing as a candidate.
-
B.
canVoteOnTreaties
Indicates that an entity has the legal authority or eligibility to participate in voting on treaties.
-
C.
canVoteIn
Indicates that one entity has the legal right or eligibility to participate as a voter in an election or decision-making process associated with another entity.
-
D.
hasFederalElectorate
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific federal electoral district that represents it in a national legislative body.
-
E.
canVoteOn
chosen
Indicates that an entity has the right or permission to participate in a decision-making process by casting a vote on a specific item, issue, or proposal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d0a7688190af3fe3e6e26d01ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69c234d648190a243fb2b107136a9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69665cd9c819088c388fc82fec42e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:04 p.m.