Triple

T311108
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject HTTPS E7608 entity
Predicate definedIn P775 FINISHED
Object RFC 9110 E39861 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 9110 | Statement: [HTTPS, definedIn, RFC 9110]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 9110
Context triple: [HTTPS, definedIn, RFC 9110]
  • A. RFC 9110 chosen
    RFC 9110 is an IETF specification that defines the core semantics and architecture of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP).
  • B. RFC 9111
    RFC 9111 is an IETF specification that defines HTTP caching semantics, detailing how responses can be stored, reused, and validated to improve web performance and efficiency.
  • C. RFC 9112
    RFC 9112 is the IETF specification that standardizes the semantics and behavior of HTTP/1.1.
  • D. RFC 9113
    RFC 9113 is the Internet standards document that specifies the HTTP/2 protocol, defining its framing, semantics, and operational behavior on the web.
  • E. RFC 9114
    RFC 9114 is the Internet standard that specifies HTTP/3, the version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol that runs over the QUIC transport protocol.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e7af7881908890039d6be4e9b8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea49636c8190a69cbd951fc0a4db completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a3bc277528819096184b6cc6b98ae2 completed March 1, 2026, 4:10 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 p.m.