Triple
T31105098
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | baliset |
E792771
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiredRealWorldInstrumentDesigns |
P50524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [baliset, inspiredRealWorldInstrumentDesigns, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiredRealWorldInstrumentDesigns Context triple: [baliset, inspiredRealWorldInstrumentDesigns, yes]
-
A.
designedInstrument
Indicates that an agent is responsible for creating or planning the design of a particular instrument.
-
B.
inspiredInstrument
chosen
Indicates that one entity served as the creative inspiration or model for the design, creation, or development of another instrument.
-
C.
instruments
Indicates that an agent uses a tool, device, or means to carry out an action or achieve an effect.
-
D.
notableInstrumentBuilt
Indicates that an entity is notable for having built or constructed a particular instrument.
-
E.
traditionalInstrument
Indicates that an entity is a musical instrument associated with the traditional or customary music of a particular culture, region, or community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cfd5d881908ec6447bc321cd58 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f74c70fd248190a9d5543afcb08211 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7478e3b548190a51d5d436e2bb036 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:03 p.m.