Triple
T31101182
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Laurel Jane Juspeczyk |
E792674
|
entity |
| Predicate | parentageSecret |
P137554
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Laurel Jane Juspeczyk, parentageSecret, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parentageSecret Context triple: [Laurel Jane Juspeczyk, parentageSecret, true]
-
A.
hasFamilySecret
chosen
Indicates that there exists a confidential or hidden matter shared within or pertaining to a family relationship.
-
B.
familySecretInvolves
Indicates that a particular family secret concerns, affects, or is about the specified entity or entities.
-
C.
paternityConcealedFrom
Indicates that one party’s biological fatherhood of another is intentionally hidden or not disclosed from a specified person or group.
-
D.
parentageIncludes
Indicates that a given parentage or lineage set contains or encompasses a particular parent or ancestral relationship.
-
E.
parentageVariant
Indicates a relationship where one entity is a variant or alternative form of another entity’s parentage or parental assignment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cf157c81909e2d2bd88c9282c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c29e1b848190b945c6c6120a5330 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c1b6e7a881908deb96bedb2713f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:03 p.m.