Triple

T31098905
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hobbs Act E792615 entity
Predicate hasMensRea P17772 FINISHED
Object knowing conduct LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: knowing conduct | Statement: [Hobbs Act, hasMensRea, knowing conduct]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMensRea
Context triple: [Hobbs Act, hasMensRea, knowing conduct]
  • A. requiresMensRea chosen
    Indicates that the action or offense is legally recognized only if the actor possessed the requisite guilty mind or intent (mens rea) when performing it.
  • B. guiltyOf
    Indicates that an entity has been judged or determined to have committed a particular offense, crime, or wrongful act.
  • C. hasMotiveOfCriminals
    Indicates that the specified motive is attributed to or associated with the criminals in question.
  • D. actualGuilt
    Indicates that an entity truly committed the offense or wrongdoing in question, regardless of legal judgment or perception.
  • E. hasAllegedJustification
    Indicates that an action, event, or claim is said or claimed to have a justification, but that justification is not established as factual or proven.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224cf157c81909e2d2bd88c9282c3 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdec5ffe088190ac5505f26c6cff18 completed May 8, 2026, 2 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdeae15f1c81908fc63fbc1b028d2e completed May 8, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:03 p.m.