Triple
T31093189
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qatar–Bahrain relations |
E792446
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalResolutionBody |
P197263
|
FINISHED |
| Object | International Court of Justice |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Court of Justice | Statement: [Qatar–Bahrain relations, legalResolutionBody, International Court of Justice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalResolutionBody Context triple: [Qatar–Bahrain relations, legalResolutionBody, International Court of Justice]
-
A.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
-
B.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
C.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
D.
legalView
Indicates that one entity holds or expresses a legal opinion, interpretation, or judgment about another entity or situation.
-
E.
legalDisputeSubject
Indicates that a legal dispute concerns, involves, or is specifically about the referenced subject or matter.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cf157c81909e2d2bd88c9282c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe831c97c88190b27ecf100e25c2a0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe7f1b92648190b14e56bcaee5d0ca |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:26 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe831ba4708190a5564afd7d5a4319 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.