Triple
T31093175
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qatar–Bahrain relations |
E792446
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalDisputeOver |
P168883
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hawar Islands |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hawar Islands | Statement: [Qatar–Bahrain relations, historicalDisputeOver, Hawar Islands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalDisputeOver Context triple: [Qatar–Bahrain relations, historicalDisputeOver, Hawar Islands]
-
A.
historicallyContestedBy
Indicates that two or more parties have disputed or challenged control, ownership, or interpretation of something over a period of history.
-
B.
historicalIssue
Indicates that one entity is a past or previously existing edition, version, or instance of another entity, typically within a chronological sequence.
-
C.
hasHistoricalPeriodOfConflict
Indicates that there exists a specific historical period during which the related entities were engaged in conflict or hostilities.
-
D.
historicallyContested
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or status between entities has been the subject of historical dispute, disagreement, or competing claims over time.
-
E.
associatedTerritoryDispute
Indicates that there is a territorial dispute or contested claim connected to the referenced entity or relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cf157c81909e2d2bd88c9282c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff27b125948190aced0fe0189fd39a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff26c30a0481909ef6a54ded851e42 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.