Triple

T310923
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject H Reactor E7604 entity
Predicate technologyLineage P11817 FINISHED
Object early U.S. production reactor designs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early U.S. production reactor designs | Statement: [H Reactor, technologyLineage, early U.S. production reactor designs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyLineage
Context triple: [H Reactor, technologyLineage, early U.S. production reactor designs]
  • A. technologyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of technology associated with an entity or relationship.
  • B. technologyLevel
    Indicates the degree of technological advancement or sophistication associated with an entity relative to others or to a defined scale.
  • C. technologyGeneration
    Indicates the generational level or era of technology associated with or used by an entity in relation to another.
  • D. technologyTrend
    Indicates a relationship where a technology is characterized as part of a broader pattern of change or direction in technological development over time.
  • E. technologicalFeature
    Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7e7af7881908890039d6be4e9b8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea49636c8190a69cbd951fc0a4db completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e940b9e8819092b821ff17ed026b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea08878c8190a5e8a90f620a3888 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 p.m.