Triple
T31083848
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UPC-E |
E792173
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresDatabaseLookupForExpansion |
P196982
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [UPC-E, requiresDatabaseLookupForExpansion, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresDatabaseLookupForExpansion Context triple: [UPC-E, requiresDatabaseLookupForExpansion, true]
-
A.
requiresExpansion
Indicates that something is currently insufficient in scope, detail, or capacity and needs to be broadened, elaborated, or increased.
-
B.
requiresFinding
Indicates that one entity’s validity, execution, or completion is contingent upon a specific finding or determination being made about another entity.
-
C.
expandsAccordingTo
Indicates that one entity increases in size, scope, or extent in a manner determined or governed by another specified factor, rule, or pattern.
-
D.
requiresSpecificityFor
Indicates that one entity or condition must be defined or described with a higher level of detail or precision in order for another entity, action, or process to be valid or applicable.
-
E.
requiresReferent
Indicates that one entity depends on or must reference another specific entity in order to be valid, interpretable, or complete.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224ce48348190bd0fc23f656ed683 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe72dca2f08190beff17de3d2aada6 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe70bca8d08190b810e1e616ceac44 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe72db8810819089e397961b8ead7a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.