Triple

T31083012
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maud of Lancaster, Countess of Leicester and Lancaster E792153 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object Countess of Lancaster C59658 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Countess of Lancaster
Context triple: [Maud of Lancaster, Countess of Leicester and Lancaster, instanceOf, Countess of Lancaster]
  • A. Countess of Leicester
    The Countess of Leicester is a noblewoman who holds, by marriage or inheritance, the aristocratic title associated with the earldom of Leicester, often playing significant social, political, and dynastic roles within the English peerage.
  • B. Duchess of Exeter
    The Duchess of Exeter is a noble title historically granted to the wife or female holder associated with the Duke of Exeter in the English peerage, signifying high aristocratic rank and close ties to the royal family.
  • C. Countess of Welles
    The Countess of Welles is a noblewoman holding the comital title associated with the Welles peerage, historically linked to the English aristocratic Welles family and their estates.
  • D. Countess of Shrewsbury
    The Countess of Shrewsbury is a noble title historically held by the wife or female counterpart of the Earl of Shrewsbury, associated with high-ranking aristocratic status and influence in English peerage.
  • E. Countess of Morton
    The Countess of Morton is a noble title historically granted to the wife or female holder associated with the Earldom of Morton, often involved in aristocratic, political, and social affairs within the Scottish peerage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224ce48348190bd0fc23f656ed683 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.