Triple

T31077845
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject vicus Portae Quirinalis E792016 entity
Predicate certaintyOfCourse P148087 FINISHED
Object uncertain LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uncertain | Statement: [vicus Portae Quirinalis, certaintyOfCourse, uncertain]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: certaintyOfCourse
Context triple: [vicus Portae Quirinalis, certaintyOfCourse, uncertain]
  • A. hasCertainty
    Indicates that a statement, belief, or relationship is associated with a specific level or degree of confidence or surety.
  • B. narrativeCertainty
    Indicates the degree of confidence or definitiveness with which a narrative, statement, or account is presented as true or reliable.
  • C. maintainsBeliefDespite
    Indicates that an entity continues to hold a particular belief even in the face of opposing evidence, pressure, or changing circumstances.
  • D. confidenceLevel chosen
    Indicates the degree of certainty or assurance associated with a particular claim, decision, or outcome.
  • E. hasUncertainty
    Indicates that the relationship or value is associated with some level or type of uncertainty rather than being fully definite or precise.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224ccdbbc81909b0cdb4cc2d70c7a completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f695bbbaa081909fb1aa003e864c08 completed May 3, 2026, 12:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f690f13d7481908ddfefe95df2a1c2 completed May 3, 2026, 12:04 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.