Triple

T31077025
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Theuderic II E791993 entity
Predicate successorAsKingOfAustrasia P198215 FINISHED
Object Chlothar II NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chlothar II | Statement: [Theuderic II, successorAsKingOfAustrasia, Chlothar II]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorAsKingOfAustrasia
Context triple: [Theuderic II, successorAsKingOfAustrasia, Chlothar II]
  • A. successorAsKingOfTheFranks
    Indicates that one person became the next king of the Franks after another person.
  • B. successorAsKingOfWestFrancia
    Indicates that one person became the next king of West Francia after another person, directly following them in that royal succession.
  • C. predecessorAsKingOfAustrasia
    Indicates that one entity previously held the position of king of Austrasia immediately before another entity.
  • D. successorAsCarolingianRuler
    Indicates that one entity became the next Carolingian ruler directly following another in the line of succession.
  • E. predecessorAsKingOfEastFrancia
    Indicates that one person previously held the position of King of East Francia immediately before another person.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224ccdbbc81909b0cdb4cc2d70c7a completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fed357b2b4819084c709056a54461f completed May 9, 2026, 6:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fed103d9cc81909b11619745110c61 completed May 9, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fed3569ca881909f4291baeb665d9d completed May 9, 2026, 6:25 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:02 p.m.