Triple

T31068834
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Walter E791755 entity
Predicate hasTechnologyBasis P191803 FINISHED
Object synthetic android technology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: synthetic android technology | Statement: [Walter, hasTechnologyBasis, synthetic android technology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTechnologyBasis
Context triple: [Walter, hasTechnologyBasis, synthetic android technology]
  • A. hasTechnologySystem
    Indicates that one entity possesses, utilizes, or is supported by a particular technology system.
  • B. hasTechnologyTheme
    Indicates that something is associated with, centers on, or prominently features technology as a primary theme or subject.
  • C. hasTechnologyDomain
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, operates within, or is relevant to a particular field or domain of technology.
  • D. hasTraditionalTechnology
    Indicates that an entity possesses, uses, or is associated with technology rooted in longstanding, customary, or indigenous practices rather than modern or industrial methods.
  • E. servedAsTechnologicalBasisFor
    Indicates that one technology, system, or method functioned as the foundational platform or enabling precursor upon which another technology was developed or built.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224cc0c5c81908404f087bff92997 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcec5f8b448190b48330a19b462d24 completed May 7, 2026, 7:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fceaf1e23881908ca24160a638e329 completed May 7, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcec5e560481909cd710b88897e833 completed May 7, 2026, 7:47 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:01 p.m.