Triple
T31064155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House of Hillel |
E791622
|
entity |
| Predicate | lineageContinuedBy |
P115355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gamaliel the Elder |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gamaliel the Elder | Statement: [House of Hillel, lineageContinuedBy, Gamaliel the Elder]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lineageContinuedBy Context triple: [House of Hillel, lineageContinuedBy, Gamaliel the Elder]
-
A.
sourceOfLineageFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the origin or ancestral source from which another entity’s lineage is derived.
-
B.
lineageRelatedTo
Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected through a line of descent or ancestry within the same lineage.
-
C.
genealogicalLine
Indicates a genealogical relationship connecting individuals through lines of descent or ancestry.
-
D.
brandLineageContinuedBy
Indicates that the continuation or successor of a brand’s lineage is carried on or maintained by another brand or entity.
-
E.
successorLine
Indicates that one line directly follows another in a sequence or ordered arrangement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cc0c5c81908404f087bff92997 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f695792b748190882e715603d406a2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690f13d7481908ddfefe95df2a1c2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:01 p.m.