Triple
T31063594
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OPCAT establishing resolution |
E791609
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOfBodyOfLaw |
P6403
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international human rights law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international human rights law | Statement: [OPCAT establishing resolution, partOfBodyOfLaw, international human rights law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfBodyOfLaw Context triple: [OPCAT establishing resolution, partOfBodyOfLaw, international human rights law]
-
A.
partOfLegalSystem
Indicates that something belongs to, is included within, or functions as a component of a particular legal system.
-
B.
governsBodyOfLaw
Indicates that one entity has authoritative control over the creation, interpretation, or enforcement of a particular body of law.
-
C.
branchOfLaw
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one legal field or discipline is a subdivision or specialized area within a broader body of law.
-
D.
subjectOfLaw
Indicates that a law, legal document, or legal provision is about, concerns, or applies to the referenced subject.
-
E.
hasPartInJurisprudence
Indicates that one legal concept, rule, or component forms a constituent part of another within the domain of jurisprudence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cc0c5c81908404f087bff92997 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff38b960808190a8263348f1e5c0e4 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff37d97d9c8190849b2bac14f9af1d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:01 p.m.