Triple
T31059319
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Selden End |
E791485
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguageOfCollections |
P30204
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Latin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin | Statement: [The Selden End, hasLanguageOfCollections, Latin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageOfCollections Context triple: [The Selden End, hasLanguageOfCollections, Latin]
-
A.
hasLanguages
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
-
B.
hasLanguageRepresentation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular natural or formal language.
-
C.
hasLanguageGroup
Indicates that an entity belongs to, is associated with, or is categorized under a particular language group.
-
D.
hasLanguageResources
Indicates that an entity possesses or provides resources related to a particular language, such as tools, materials, or services supporting its use or study.
-
E.
hasLanguageOn
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cb08908190ba71ad9aa87518ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe00dad1708190b6522476bebb43af |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdfc3717f48190bb50ac2919c8ef95 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9 p.m.