Triple
T31048227
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lord Lieutenant of County Fermanagh |
E791184
|
entity |
| Predicate | canHaveDeputies |
P45333
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vice Lord-Lieutenant of County Fermanagh |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vice Lord-Lieutenant of County Fermanagh | Statement: [Lord Lieutenant of County Fermanagh, canHaveDeputies, Vice Lord-Lieutenant of County Fermanagh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canHaveDeputies Context triple: [Lord Lieutenant of County Fermanagh, canHaveDeputies, Vice Lord-Lieutenant of County Fermanagh]
-
A.
hasNumberOfDeputies
Indicates the specific count of deputies associated with or assigned to an entity.
-
B.
mayHaveDeputy
chosen
Indicates that an entity is allowed or entitled to have another entity serving as its deputy or subordinate representative.
-
C.
hasDeputyHeads
Indicates that an entity has one or more individuals serving in subordinate leadership roles as deputy heads.
-
D.
hasDeputeLeader
Indicates that an entity serves as the deputy leader (second-in-command) of another entity.
-
E.
deputyOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the subordinate or second-in-command to another, acting with delegated authority on their behalf.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224ca2fa881908a3ac5fedf207b90 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6953db334819083dcdfcf1e3d97f2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690f13d7481908ddfefe95df2a1c2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9 p.m.