Triple
T31044393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Torwood Excommunication of 1680 |
E791082
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOpposedDoctrine |
P64120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Erastianism |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Erastianism | Statement: [Torwood Excommunication of 1680, hasOpposedDoctrine, Erastianism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOpposedDoctrine Context triple: [Torwood Excommunication of 1680, hasOpposedDoctrine, Erastianism]
-
A.
doctrinalOppositionFrom
Indicates a relationship where one party holds or expresses doctrinal disagreement or opposition toward another party or their teachings.
-
B.
hasOpposedIdea
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds an idea that conflicts with, contradicts, or stands in opposition to the idea held by another entity.
-
C.
hasOpposedAuthority
Indicates that one entity holds authority that is in conflict with, challenges, or stands in opposition to the authority of another entity.
-
D.
disputedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, teaching, or belief is contested or not universally accepted between parties.
-
E.
hasOpposedCondition
Indicates that one condition stands in direct opposition or contradiction to another condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224ca2fa881908a3ac5fedf207b90 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7817daf00819098936402e75ab0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780fc5ed88190b7200ee5a29940af |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:59 p.m.