Triple
T31044379
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Torwood Excommunication of 1680 |
E791082
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOpposedAuthority |
P181677
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stuart royal authority |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stuart royal authority | Statement: [Torwood Excommunication of 1680, hasOpposedAuthority, Stuart royal authority]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOpposedAuthority Context triple: [Torwood Excommunication of 1680, hasOpposedAuthority, Stuart royal authority]
-
A.
hasOpposedActivity
Indicates that one activity stands in opposition or conflict to another activity.
-
B.
hasOppositionalInstitution
Indicates that one institution stands in an oppositional or adversarial relationship to another institution.
-
C.
hasOpposedParty
Indicates that one party is in an opposing or adversarial position relative to another party, typically within a dispute, conflict, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
hasOpposedCondition
Indicates that one condition stands in direct opposition or contradiction to another condition.
-
E.
hasOppositionRoleSince
Indicates that an entity has held a specific opposition role or position continuously since a given point in time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224ca2fa881908a3ac5fedf207b90 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7805ce6208190ac6dbd9c97989978 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f77956ec648190ba4fb7e9d83fd107 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7805c25dc8190b9977c561ba15975 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:59 p.m.