Triple
T31041606
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ariel DuBois |
E791009
|
entity |
| Predicate | similarAbilitiesTo |
P71422
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Allison DuBois |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Allison DuBois | Statement: [Ariel DuBois, similarAbilitiesTo, Allison DuBois]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: similarAbilitiesTo Context triple: [Ariel DuBois, similarAbilitiesTo, Allison DuBois]
-
A.
sharesCompetencesWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities possess and can apply the same or overlapping set of skills, abilities, or areas of expertise.
-
B.
moreSimilarTo
Indicates that one entity bears a greater degree of similarity to a second entity than to a third entity, according to some defined similarity measure.
-
C.
benefitsSimilarTo
Indicates that one entity provides advantages or positive effects that are comparable in nature or degree to those provided by another entity.
-
D.
believedToHaveAbility
Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed to possess a particular capability or power, without asserting that the ability is actually verified.
-
E.
roleSimilarTo
Indicates that two entities have roles or functions that are alike or closely comparable in nature or responsibility.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224ca2fa881908a3ac5fedf207b90 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f694fa62308190aa7ca49724a6cb06 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690f13d7481908ddfefe95df2a1c2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:59 p.m.