Triple
T31033680
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jaktorów Forest |
E790798
|
entity |
| Predicate | significantSpecies |
P965
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aurochs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aurochs | Statement: [Jaktorów Forest, significantSpecies, aurochs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: significantSpecies Context triple: [Jaktorów Forest, significantSpecies, aurochs]
-
A.
notableSpecies
chosen
Indicates that the subject is known for, or significantly associated with, the specified species.
-
B.
notableSpeciesRole
Indicates that a species plays a particularly important, characteristic, or influential role in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
featuresSpecies
Indicates that something includes, presents, or highlights a particular species as part of its content or composition.
-
D.
notableSpeciesGroup
Indicates that an entity is a significant or characteristic member of a particular species group associated with another entity.
-
E.
someSpeciesAre
Indicates that at least one member of a specified group or category belongs to, or can be classified as, a particular species.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c97a788190b5da1ead6038a74e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:59 p.m.