Triple
T31032247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Unit 4 reactor building |
E790757
|
entity |
| Predicate | seismicReinforcement |
P13028
|
FINISHED |
| Object | installed after 2011 accident |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: installed after 2011 accident | Statement: [Unit 4 reactor building, seismicReinforcement, installed after 2011 accident]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seismicReinforcement Context triple: [Unit 4 reactor building, seismicReinforcement, installed after 2011 accident]
-
A.
seismicRetrofit
chosen
Indicates that an existing structure has been modified or strengthened to improve its performance and safety during seismic events such as earthquakes.
-
B.
seismicDesign
Indicates that an entity is designed or engineered to withstand seismic activity or earthquake-related forces.
-
C.
earthquakeResistance
Indicates how well an entity can withstand or remain functional during an earthquake without significant damage.
-
D.
seismicSafetyConcernsIdentified
Indicates that potential risks or issues related to seismic safety have been detected or recognized.
-
E.
hasSeismicBehavior
Indicates that an entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular type or pattern of seismic activity or response.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c97a788190b5da1ead6038a74e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f694c2fe008190b643a2b2d8274669 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690f13d7481908ddfefe95df2a1c2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:59 p.m.