Triple
T31004916
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tobin tax |
E790040
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProposedRate |
P201870
|
FINISHED |
| Object | small percentage of transaction value |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small percentage of transaction value | Statement: [Tobin tax, hasProposedRate, small percentage of transaction value]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProposedRate Context triple: [Tobin tax, hasProposedRate, small percentage of transaction value]
-
A.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
-
B.
hasProposedOutcome
Indicates that an action, decision, or process is associated with a suggested or anticipated result that is being put forward but not yet realized or confirmed.
-
C.
hasProposedRole
Indicates that one entity has suggested or put forward a specific role or position for another entity.
-
D.
hasProposal
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is the subject of a specific proposal.
-
E.
hasProposedResolution
Indicates that an entity has put forward a specific resolution or solution for consideration or decision regarding another entity or issue.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c73ca48190a1e46cb58ad4045b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a002dd4066c8190945a09ed82f44f3f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a002b141f4081909999e14988105f3a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:52 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a002dd3294881909e860157fc459a85 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:57 p.m.