Triple

T3098584
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Book of Signs E64659 entity
Predicate hasInterpretiveFramework P33381 FINISHED
Object signs as symbolic actions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: signs as symbolic actions | Statement: [Book of Signs, hasInterpretiveFramework, signs as symbolic actions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInterpretiveFramework
Context triple: [Book of Signs, hasInterpretiveFramework, signs as symbolic actions]
  • A. containsInterpretationOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
  • B. isInterpretedBy
    Indicates that something (such as data, a work, or a signal) is given meaning, understanding, or explanation by a particular agent or process.
  • C. hasInterpretiveSigns
    Indicates that interpretive or informational signs are present at or associated with the subject.
  • D. interpretationMethod
    Indicates the method, technique, or process used to interpret or derive meaning from something.
  • E. hasDistinctiveFrameworkWith
    Indicates that one entity possesses a unique or distinguishing structural framework in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857dc98481909e585dc3372e3ed5 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada23dde988190a1aca020685594f3 completed March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9df06ed88190809f0683122caa5a completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.