Triple

T30974055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Smith's E789178 entity
Predicate targetConsumerContext P97560 FINISHED
Object pubs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pubs | Statement: [John Smith's, targetConsumerContext, pubs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetConsumerContext
Context triple: [John Smith's, targetConsumerContext, pubs]
  • A. targetConsumerInStory
    Indicates that a specified consumer is the intended or focal target within the context of a particular story or narrative.
  • B. intendedTargetContext
    Indicates the context, situation, or setting that an action, message, or object is specifically designed or meant to be used in or directed toward.
  • C. targetConsumerNeed
    Indicates that something is intended to address, satisfy, or be directed toward a specific need or requirement of a consumer.
  • D. supplyContext
    Indicates that one entity provides relevant background information or situational details that clarify or frame another entity, action, or statement.
  • E. primaryConsumptionContext chosen
    Indicates the main situation, setting, or context in which something is typically used, consumed, or experienced.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224c4831c8190be53924ec25a150a completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd68abf52881909c5a390c362b7c59 completed May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd6812d0c88190930d8fa2d4b92490 completed May 8, 2026, 4:35 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:55 p.m.