Triple
T3096836
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mattea |
E64614
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalAttestation |
P31880
|
FINISHED |
| Object | documented as wife of John Cabot |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: documented as wife of John Cabot | Statement: [Mattea, historicalAttestation, documented as wife of John Cabot]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalAttestation Context triple: [Mattea, historicalAttestation, documented as wife of John Cabot]
-
A.
attestedBy
Indicates that the existence, occurrence, or validity of something is supported, confirmed, or documented by a specified source or authority.
-
B.
hasAttestation
Indicates that there exists a formal confirmation, evidence, or certification supporting the validity or authenticity of something.
-
C.
attestation
Indicates a formal declaration or confirmation that something is true, accurate, or has been verified.
-
D.
hasHistoricalAttribution
Indicates that something is credited, assigned, or linked to a person, group, or source based on historical records or tradition.
-
E.
attestedAs
chosen
Indicates that something is documented, recorded, or certified as having a particular status, form, or property.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857dc98481909e585dc3372e3ed5 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada23cbe3c8190b7ec5cfd464a1ca8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9df06ed88190809f0683122caa5a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.