Triple
T3096425
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nomad |
E64604
|
entity |
| Predicate | behaviorAfterMerge |
P45890
|
FINISHED |
| Object | planet-threatening |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: planet-threatening | Statement: [Nomad, behaviorAfterMerge, planet-threatening]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: behaviorAfterMerge Context triple: [Nomad, behaviorAfterMerge, planet-threatening]
-
A.
mergedBy
Indicates that one entity is combined or integrated into another entity through the action or decision of a specific agent.
-
B.
reasonForMerger
Indicates the underlying cause, motivation, or justification for why two or more entities merged.
-
C.
mergedOrReorganized
Indicates that one entity has combined with or been structurally reorganized into another entity, resulting in a changed or unified organizational form.
-
D.
mergerResult
Indicates that one or more entities have combined into a single entity, specifying the outcome or resulting entity of the merger.
-
E.
mergerType
Indicates the specific kind or category of merger relationship that exists between the involved entities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857dc98481909e585dc3372e3ed5 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada23cbe3c8190b7ec5cfd464a1ca8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9df06ed88190809f0683122caa5a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada0f6fef48190b13898be383a246b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.