Triple

T3095611
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ceboruco E64587 entity
Predicate isPotentiallyHazardous P1950 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Ceboruco, isPotentiallyHazardous, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPotentiallyHazardous
Context triple: [Ceboruco, isPotentiallyHazardous, yes]
  • A. hasNotableHazard
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant risk, danger, or harmful condition that is noteworthy or exceptional.
  • B. isHighlyRadioactive
    Indicates that the subject emits ionizing radiation at a very high level relative to typical or safe standards.
  • C. hazardType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of hazard associated with an entity or situation.
  • D. hazardScope
    Indicates the range or extent within which a particular hazard is relevant, applicable, or has effect.
  • E. inDangerSince
    Indicates that an entity has been in a state of danger continuously starting from a specified point in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857c97d88190b26f9b1c90839c77 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada23b04188190919a69987d2c180f completed March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9df06ed88190809f0683122caa5a completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.