Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: United States v. Darby Lumber Co. | Statement: [Hammer v. Dagenhart, laterOverruledBy, United States v. Darby Lumber Co.]

Target entity: United States v. Darby Lumber Co.
Context triple: [Hammer v. Dagenhart, laterOverruledBy, United States v. Darby Lumber Co.]

• A. United States v. Darby chosen
  United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
• B. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
  Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
• C. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.
  Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co. was a landmark U.S. class-action sexual harassment lawsuit brought by female mine workers in Minnesota’s Iron Range, recognized as one of the first major cases to address workplace sexual harassment in a blue-collar industry.
• D. NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
  NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
• E. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
  West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld minimum wage laws and effectively ended the Lochner era by allowing greater government regulation of economic conditions.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: laterOverruledBy
Context triple: [Hammer v. Dagenhart, laterOverruledBy, United States v. Darby Lumber Co.]

• A. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• B. overturnedDecisionOf chosen
  Indicates that one decision reversed, nullified, or set aside a previous decision.
• C. overturnedInPartBy
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
• D. overturnedLaw
  Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
• E. upheldBy
  Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
• F. None of above.