Triple
T30952651
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gworam language |
E788588
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Angas–Sura language variety |
C57782
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Angas–Sura language variety Context triple: [Gworam language, instanceOf, Angas–Sura language variety]
-
A.
Subanen language variety
A Subanen language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Subanen language spoken by Subanen communities in the Zamboanga Peninsula and surrounding areas of the southern Philippines, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features.
-
B.
Rarámuri language variety
A Rarámuri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Rarámuri linguistic continuum.
-
C.
Mari language variety
A Mari language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Mari language, distinguished by its unique phonological, grammatical, and lexical features used by a particular Mari-speaking community.
-
D.
Luri language variety
A Luri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Luri language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader continuum of Southwestern Iranian dialects.
-
E.
Semai language variety
A Semai language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Semai language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features used by a particular Semai-speaking community.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c28c1881908c33b45d689f1724 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:53 p.m.