Triple

T30943035
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heartman E788312 entity
Predicate providesToProtagonist P49758 FINISHED
Object scientific analysis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scientific analysis | Statement: [Heartman, providesToProtagonist, scientific analysis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: providesToProtagonist
Context triple: [Heartman, providesToProtagonist, scientific analysis]
  • A. wouldProvide
    Indicates that one entity is willing or expected to supply or furnish something to another entity under certain conditions.
  • B. hasProtagonistAbility
    Indicates that a protagonist possesses a specific ability, power, or special skill.
  • C. hasProtagonist
    Indicates that a work of narrative has a main character who serves as its central focus or driving agent.
  • D. helpsProtagonistWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity assists the protagonist in performing, achieving, or dealing with something specified by the other entity.
  • E. providesThat
    Indicates that one entity stipulates, specifies, or sets forth a condition, rule, or provision that applies to another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224c180f88190ad177372ee02b7e2 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd592e48cc81909d754cc6c4bd99ae completed May 8, 2026, 3:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd58b7f9b881909dc099b28d567784 completed May 8, 2026, 3:30 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:53 p.m.