Triple
T30936479
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wa State |
E788136
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerEconomy |
P19843
|
FINISHED |
| Object | opium production |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opium production | Statement: [Wa State, formerEconomy, opium production]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerEconomy Context triple: [Wa State, formerEconomy, opium production]
-
A.
formerEconomicActivity
chosen
Indicates that an entity previously engaged in a specified economic activity but no longer does so.
-
B.
economicSystem
Indicates the type or structure of the economic organization or system under which an entity operates or to which it belongs.
-
C.
economyContrast
Indicates that two entities are being compared or opposed in terms of their economic characteristics, conditions, or performance.
-
D.
economicExtensionOf
Indicates that one entity’s economy is heavily dependent on, controlled by, or functions as an outgrowth of another entity’s economic system.
-
E.
economicAspect
Indicates that something is related to, characterized by, or has implications for economic factors, conditions, or outcomes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c0b7fc819090cb89df60d23653 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff17be6ad48190963206f2619b1b28 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1724ba24819092c928fcbcb286ec |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:52 p.m.