Triple
T30933484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scrantonicity |
E788056
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSpinOffBandName |
P7226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Scrantonicity II |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scrantonicity II | Statement: [Scrantonicity, hasSpinOffBandName, Scrantonicity II]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpinOffBandName Context triple: [Scrantonicity, hasSpinOffBandName, Scrantonicity II]
-
A.
hasSpinOffLabel
Indicates that one entity serves as a spin-off label or subsidiary label that originated from another label entity.
-
B.
hasSpinOff
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a derivative or spin-off product, work, or organization that originated from another entity.
-
C.
laterBandName
Indicates that the second band name is a new or subsequent name adopted by the same band that previously used the first band name.
-
D.
hasOriginalBandNameOf
Indicates that one entity is the original band name used by another musical group or artist.
-
E.
hasSpinOffPotential
Indicates that an entity (such as a project, product, or idea) has the capacity to be developed into a separate, independent venture or derivative offering.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c0b7fc819090cb89df60d23653 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcef654d588190b29ecc76678d1aa0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcecdb97f48190b382b7d13be92dc0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:52 p.m.