Triple

T30932817
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scranton branch E788040 entity
Predicate hasHRRepresentativeCharacter P64336 FINISHED
Object Toby Flenderson NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toby Flenderson | Statement: [Scranton branch, hasHRRepresentativeCharacter, Toby Flenderson]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHRRepresentativeCharacter
Context triple: [Scranton branch, hasHRRepresentativeCharacter, Toby Flenderson]
  • A. humanRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves as a human agent or delegate acting on behalf of another entity.
  • B. hasHRIdentifier
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific identifier used by a Human Resources system to uniquely reference it.
  • C. employerRepresentative chosen
    Indicates that one entity acts on behalf of, or represents, an employer in an official or work-related capacity.
  • D. hasTypeOfRepresentative
    Indicates that one entity serves as a specific kind or category of representative for another entity.
  • E. hasCoRepresentativeRole
    Indicates that an entity shares or holds a co-representative role or position alongside another entity within the same representational context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224c0b7fc819090cb89df60d23653 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f692e1aef48190b8ac1b2027013d94 completed May 3, 2026, 12:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f68b7ec098819080480998038de940 completed May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:52 p.m.