Triple
T3093037
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yokohama Landmark Tower |
E64526
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSeismicDesign |
P8962
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes | Statement: [Yokohama Landmark Tower, hasSeismicDesign, Yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSeismicDesign Context triple: [Yokohama Landmark Tower, hasSeismicDesign, Yes]
-
A.
seismicDesign
chosen
Indicates that an entity is designed or engineered to withstand seismic activity or earthquake-related forces.
-
B.
seismicRetrofit
Indicates that an existing structure has been modified or strengthened to improve its performance and safety during seismic events such as earthquakes.
-
C.
hasStructuralEngineer
Indicates that an entity is associated with or employs a structural engineer responsible for its structural design, analysis, or integrity.
-
D.
hasArchitecturalFeature
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is characterized by a specific architectural feature or element.
-
E.
architecturalIntegrity
Indicates that an entity maintains the coherence, stability, and consistency of its overall structural or design framework without compromising essential components or principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857c97d88190b26f9b1c90839c77 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada21055b88190b602425a513af7e6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9ded78f881908be6fc0fb7c35764 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.