Triple
T30896848
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Safavid royal court |
E787042
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtCultureFeature |
P15786
|
FINISHED |
| Object | elaborate etiquette |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elaborate etiquette | Statement: [Safavid royal court, courtCultureFeature, elaborate etiquette]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtCultureFeature Context triple: [Safavid royal court, courtCultureFeature, elaborate etiquette]
-
A.
courtCulture
chosen
Indicates the prevailing norms, practices, and behavioral expectations that characterize how a particular court operates and conducts its proceedings.
-
B.
courtFeatured
Indicates that a particular court prominently presented, highlighted, or showcased a given entity (such as a case, event, or person) in an official or notable context.
-
C.
courtSphere
Indicates a relationship where one entity operates within, is associated with, or has authority in a particular judicial or legal domain or sphere.
-
D.
courtStyle
Indicates the manner or stylistic approach in which a court conducts its proceedings or presents its decisions.
-
E.
courtContext
Indicates the legal or judicial setting, circumstances, or framework within which a court-related action or relationship takes place.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224bcbcb48190836df847424e4057 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a916d2e08190bafc01cba73b6469 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a7548eb48190a69b60a3c6ad53b9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:49 p.m.