Triple

T30894742
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Burmese culture E786990 entity
Predicate hasEthnicVariation P180810 FINISHED
Object Mon cultural traditions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mon cultural traditions | Statement: [Burmese culture, hasEthnicVariation, Mon cultural traditions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEthnicVariation
Context triple: [Burmese culture, hasEthnicVariation, Mon cultural traditions]
  • A. hasEthnicCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular ethnic characteristic or identity.
  • B. hasEthnonymVariant
    Indicates that one ethnonym is an alternative or variant form of another ethnonym referring to the same ethnic group.
  • C. hasEthnicInfluence
    Indicates that one entity has a cultural, traditional, or ethnic impact on, or contributes to shaping the ethnic character of, another entity.
  • D. hasEthnicScope
    Indicates that something is relevant or applicable specifically to a particular ethnic group or ethnic context.
  • E. hasEthnicOrRegionalOrigin
    Indicates that an entity originates from, or is associated with, a particular ethnic group or geographic region.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224bbfa7c81908448e0c261c523e3 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7516d5b4081908588a6feb541f355 completed May 3, 2026, 1:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f74d40ebb081909daf60623e38f41d completed May 3, 2026, 1:27 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7516c538481908c6e55cf76add098 completed May 3, 2026, 1:45 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:49 p.m.