Triple
T30888840
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Department of Richmond commanders |
E786839
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCapitalDefenceRole |
P18085
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Department of Richmond commanders, hasCapitalDefenceRole, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCapitalDefenceRole Context triple: [Department of Richmond commanders, hasCapitalDefenceRole, true]
-
A.
hasCapitalRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds an official role, function, or status specifically associated with a capital city.
-
B.
isDefensiveStock
Indicates that a stock tends to maintain its value and perform relatively steadily during market downturns or economic uncertainty.
-
C.
providesDefence
Indicates that one entity offers protection or defensive support to another entity.
-
D.
defensiveCapability
Indicates the ability or capacity of an entity to protect itself or others against threats, attacks, or harm.
-
E.
hasDefenseStrategy
Indicates that an entity employs or is associated with a particular plan or set of measures designed to protect against threats or attacks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224bbfa7c81908448e0c261c523e3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe349879848190bcd77e3cc3470458 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe31e3cf908190b23ebc2f7fe58722 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:49 p.m.