Triple
T30888009
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polly Sherman |
E786819
|
entity |
| Predicate | voiceOfReasonFor |
P177164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Basil Fawlty |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Basil Fawlty | Statement: [Polly Sherman, voiceOfReasonFor, Basil Fawlty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: voiceOfReasonFor Context triple: [Polly Sherman, voiceOfReasonFor, Basil Fawlty]
-
A.
rationalizationOf
Indicates that one entity serves as a justification, explanation, or reasoning framework for another entity, often making the latter appear more logical or acceptable.
-
B.
canReasonAbout
Indicates that one entity has the capability to understand, analyze, or draw inferences about another entity or subject.
-
C.
reasonWritten
Indicates that one entity is the reason or motivation for which another entity was written or authored.
-
D.
statedReason
Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
-
E.
arguesFrom
Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224bbfa7c81908448e0c261c523e3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f85bfba48190aba95b40642a8ca7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f65fd1d08190b88e5e68ba268500 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6f854486c81909396d944a55e03ab |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:49 p.m.