Triple
T3087069
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ebony and Ivory |
E64395
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesWordplayOn |
P37943
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ebony and ivory piano keys |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ebony and ivory piano keys | Statement: [Ebony and Ivory, usesWordplayOn, ebony and ivory piano keys]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesWordplayOn Context triple: [Ebony and Ivory, usesWordplayOn, ebony and ivory piano keys]
-
A.
isPlayOnWordsWith
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one expression is a pun or wordplay that depends on, echoes, or cleverly twists the wording or meaning of another expression.
-
B.
parodies
Indicates that one entity imitates another in an exaggerated or humorous way, often to criticize or comment on the original.
-
C.
hasRhymingSlangExample
Indicates that one entity serves as an example of rhyming slang associated with another entity.
-
D.
usedPhrase
Indicates that one entity employed or expressed a particular phrase in speech, writing, or another form of communication.
-
E.
rhetoricalDevice
Indicates that one entity is used as a rhetorical device in relation to another, such as a figure of speech, stylistic technique, or persuasive strategy within a discourse.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857c97d88190b26f9b1c90839c77 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada1ec187c819084565514ebb99cdb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9ded78f881908be6fc0fb7c35764 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.