Triple
T30866198
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Requiem pour un con |
E786205
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSpokenWordStyle |
P108014
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Requiem pour un con, hasSpokenWordStyle, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpokenWordStyle Context triple: [Requiem pour un con, hasSpokenWordStyle, true]
-
A.
isSpoken
Indicates that a language or utterance is produced orally by a speaker or used in spoken form within a given context.
-
B.
hasSpokenStandard
Indicates that an entity has spoken using a recognized standard form of a language (e.g., standard dialect or official register).
-
C.
hasSpokenWordIntro
Indicates that an entity includes or features an introductory segment performed in spoken word form.
-
D.
isSpokenAlong
Indicates that something (typically a language or dialect) is used or spoken in the regions or areas that follow a particular path, boundary, or route.
-
E.
hasSpokenWordSections
chosen
Indicates that something contains or includes sections where words are spoken rather than sung or played.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b9df2c819086f55f8bcf7f382e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcec5f8b448190b48330a19b462d24 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fceaf1e23881908ca24160a638e329 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:47 p.m.