Triple
T3086034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Portsmouth |
E64374
|
entity |
| Predicate | protocolCount |
P45788
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 3 protocols |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 protocols | Statement: [Treaty of Portsmouth, protocolCount, 3 protocols]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protocolCount Context triple: [Treaty of Portsmouth, protocolCount, 3 protocols]
-
A.
protocolNumber
Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a protocol that governs or documents an interaction, process, or agreement between entities.
-
B.
protocolNumberSpace
Indicates that there is a defined set or range of valid protocol numbers associated with the given protocol or system.
-
C.
protocolVersion
Indicates the specific version of a protocol that governs how two or more entities communicate or interact.
-
D.
protocolName
Indicates the specific communication or interaction protocol used or associated with an entity or connection.
-
E.
protocolLayer
Indicates a relationship where a communication protocol operates at, or is associated with, a specific layer in a protocol stack or network architecture.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857bb4c88190a4cf27893fcabed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada1eac5548190bee60ea8262c65a8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9ded78f881908be6fc0fb7c35764 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada0f6fef48190b13898be383a246b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.