Triple

T30845735
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Communes of Yvelines E785626 entity
Predicate useLegalSystem P131132 FINISHED
Object French law NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French law | Statement: [Communes of Yvelines, useLegalSystem, French law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: useLegalSystem
Context triple: [Communes of Yvelines, useLegalSystem, French law]
  • A. usedLegalSystemOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity applied, followed, or operated under the legal system or body of laws belonging to another entity.
  • B. legalSystem
    Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
  • C. usesLawTo
    Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific law as a means or tool to affect, regulate, or influence another entity or situation.
  • D. relatedLegalSystem
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
  • E. legalSystemImposed
    Indicates that one authority or group has established and enforced a particular legal system upon another population or territory.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b850848190a4af4ccf8ddadcdf completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69177998c8190a7d6dabd7b67b53b completed May 3, 2026, 12:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f68b7d2794819092fef8a63f4f3de8 completed May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:46 p.m.